He was on his way to the school to help make gingerbread houses with 1st graders when he heard the shots. He is the father of a student there and the athletic director at the highschool. Anyway, you can easily google and figure out who the guy in the woods was. Odd that conspiracy theorists distrust the media, then turn around and use its raw reporting claims as evidence. They love to grab early media footage and then use that as "evidence" of their claims, as if the media's first reporting is somehow golden. Theory 1: The first thing the video tries to allege is that there is a second shooter. What's the motivation for promoting fallacious claims that seem compelling on the surface, and which ultimately aims to stir up fear about gun control? You can draw your own conclusions.ĭebunking the Sandy hook conspiracy video, point-by-point And of course, the video creator knew this, muted the audio and used this as evidence to create suspicion in the viewer. However, if you watch the clip with the audio unmuted, it's obvious that the couple is happy because they are reminiscing about positive memories of their daughter. The audio is muted throughout while the narrator insinuates that the parents may be actors. The most clear example: The CNN Anderson Cooper interview where the narrator questions the authenticity of the parents happy facial expressions. The bottom line is, this video relied on making some rather blatant and disingenuous claims that point to a deliberate attempt to deceive and misinform. This is the subject of our editorial: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theories Are a Detriment to Alternative Media's Credibility.įor the most comprehensive review, check out this written response which addresses every main claim from the most popular conspiracy video : But it's worth mentioning that part 1's insulting dismissal of "conspiracy theorists" and the lumping in of 9/11 truth with this conspiracy is *exactly* the disastrous fall-out that occurs when conspiracy truth seekers promote every conspiracy without self-discipline or restraint. If you want a more moderate tone see part 3. Our apologies for the swearing and insulting tone of part 1. Addressing the countless "Sandy Hook was a hoax" videos that have been spreading, in 3 parts.
0 kommentar(er)
